Legal Opinion

Ortlieb v. Baumer

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 9, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAPPEY, District Judge.

This has been a very puzzling case. It has been filled with irrelevaneies. The ill feeling between the litigants is utterly immaterial to the determination of the issues. The situation in which the bankrupt found himself — in the respects that he suffered ill health, he had domestic infelicities, and he has been greatly harassed by creditors — is likewise immaterial. Whatever might be the feeling of the court in regard to his misfortunes, which I have mentioned, they are not pertinent to the determination of the issues now before the court. If they be of any…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Butz v. Sohigro Service Co. (In Re Evans Potato Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1984
  2. Hulk v. Rosenbaum (In Re Hulk)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1981
  3. Vance v. DuganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  4. Steinmetz v. Sorokin (In Re Beechwood Medicenter of Flint, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API