Legal Opinion

In re the habeas corpus for Fitton

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1858PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Joseph Keefe was cited to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt in arresting Fitton after he was discharged on the return of the writ of habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, Justice.

Keefe made return to the writ, that he had no opposition to the discharge, and had no further return to make thereon, whereupon the prisoner was discharged, and before leaving the court-room, without any warrant or process, Keefe again arrested the prisoner, and carried him back to the same prison. If such a proceeding could be toler*304ated, the writ of habeas corpus would be of no avail, for as often as a man was declared to be illegally imprisoned, he could be arrested on another charge, and carried back to prison. If Keefe had any authority to make the arrest, he should have…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Robbins v. BensonOregon Supreme Court · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API