Legal Opinion
M.F. v. Pac. Pearl Hotel Mgmt. LLC
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided October 26, 2017No. D070150PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCONNELL, P.J.
*696I
INTRODUCTION
In this appeal, we address whether, for purposes of overcoming the workers' compensation exclusivity doctrine ( Lab. Code, §§ 3600, subd. (a), 3602, subd. (a) ), a housekeeping employee stated claims against her hotel employer for violating provisions in the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA; Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq. )1 requiring the employer to protect the employee from nonemployee sexual harassment. The employee alleged facts showing: (1) she was raped while working on the employer's premises by a drunk nonemployee trespasser; (2) the employer knew or should…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Yvanova v. New Century Mortgage Corp.California Supreme Court · 2016
- Trujillo v. North County Transit Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Klein v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- CHARLES J. VACANTI v. State Comp. Ins. FundCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Carter v. Dept. of Veterans AffairsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alfredo Martinez v. WAYFAIR, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
- Colborn v. Chevron U.S.A. CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Huckins, Jr. v. Amazon.com Services LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Jorge Avila v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., et al.District Court, C.D. California · 2026
- Tijerina v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2022