Legal Opinion
Marcantel v. Manuel
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 6, 1961No. 376PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CULPEPPER, Judge.
In the above numbered and entitled cause, plaintiff has appealed from a judgment (rendered after a new trial) denying plaintiff’s motion for judgment pro con-fesso against the garnishee, Kinder Rice Dryer, Inc. In the companion case entitled Kinder Rice Dryer, Inc. v. Marcantel, La.App., 134 So.2d 618, in which case we have this date rendered a separate decision, plaintiff has appealed from a judgment setting aside the original judgment pro confesso against the said garnishee and granting a new trial to said garnishee in these proceedings entitled “Oleno Marcantel v. Severen…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dixon v. KingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
- Southern Natural Gas Company v. RolandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
- Snuggs v. BurrusLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
- T. Defatta & Sons v. HydeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
- Kinder Rice Dryer, Inc. v. MarcantelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lytell v. Strickland Transp. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Brumfield v. BrumfieldLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Portier v. Marquette Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1964
- Kinder Rice Dryer, Inc. v. MarcantelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Lytell v. Strickland Transportation Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1978