Legal Opinion

Navarro v. Hull

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 31, 1946No. Crim. 1975PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Lassen County discharging a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding initiated by Luis Navarro, who sought thereby to secure the custody of a female child of the age of about seven years, which child had been born to petitioner and one Gladys Hull (both Klamath Indians), who were never married. The petition alleged that in June, 1945, petitioner had publicly acknowledged said child to be his own, and had, with the consent of his wife, Joan Navarro, received said child into his family, and had otherwise treated said child as his legitimate…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Blythe v. AyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. McNamara v. McNamaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Munson v. MunsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Estate of LundCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Richard M.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Darwin v. GangerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Strong v. OwensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. DELA ROSABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1974
  5. Beatrice A. Nielsen Tyler v. Louis Armstrong, as Administrator of the Estate of Felix FrancisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API