Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Drumheller

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1928No. 21429. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

The plaintiff sued to recover damages for a breach of an alleged promise to marry. The action was tried to a jury, and a verdict returned in favor of the plaintiff for ten thousand dollars. From a judgment on the verdict, the defendant has appealed.

The assignments of error question only the ruling of the trial court in denying a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto and entering judgment on the verdict.

The appellant cheerfully recognizes our well settled rule that a motion for judgment n. o. v. invokes no element of discretion, hut only the judicial function, and can be granted only when…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McUne v. FuquaWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Bilski v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Hansen v. ColdwellWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. First State Bank v. MerrittWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. McUne v. FuquaWashington Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API