Legal Opinion

Miller v. Stern

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 26, 1950PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

The petitioner, an attorney, performed certain services in connection with a controversy arising out of the probate of the will and two codicils of Doris S. Bachrach, who died on August 27, 1948. The will and codicils, as modified by a compromise agreement, were allowed on June 7, 1949. In this petition, which is brought in the Probate Court under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 215, § 39A, inserted by St. 1947, c. 536, the petitioner alleges that he performed services “for the benefit of or in connection with the estate” of the testatrix, and asks the court to fix and determine his compensation for such…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Condon v. HaitsmaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  2. Commissioner of Insurance v. Massachusetts Accident Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  3. Thibault v. LalumiereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Commissioner of Banks v. Prudential Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  5. Rudd v. SearlesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Graci v. DamonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  2. Perry v. PerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  3. Dennis v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  4. Mahoney v. MahoneyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
  5. Lane v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API