Hambridge Steel Erectors, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Dissenting Opinion by

Hoffman, J.:

In my opinion the majority has clouded the issue in this case by framing it in terms of a request for in*429creased wages. The real issue in this case is whether an employer may require that his employee work overtime without paying him for this additional work.

The majority, while recognizing the rule that the Board’s findings of fact, if supported by evidence, are conclusive on appeal, Progress Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 406 Pa. 163, 176 A. 2d 632 (1962), nonetheless, chooses to ignore these findings.

The Board…