Legal Opinion

Brizendine v. Visador Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 29, 1970No. 25208PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:

After a non-jury trial in this diversity action to recover damages for personal injuries, the district court granted judgment for plaintiff Susan D. Brizendine and against Visador Company (Visa-dor), and Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company (PPG). PPG alone appeals.

On the night of November 12, 1964, Susan and other high-school age parishioners of First Christian Church, La *824Grande, Oregon, were standing in the lobby of the church prior to the commencement of a church youth group meeting. Susan was standing near the doorway to the lobby. When one of the boys arrived and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Klix Chemical Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Hills v. McGillvreyOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Watts v. Bacon & Van Buskirk Glass Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Johnny Paul Thibodaux v. McWane Cast Iron Pipe CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  5. Ashland v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
  2. Bryant v. Technical Research Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. Hill v. General Motors Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Pearl v. Allied Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Brizendine v. Visador CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API