Brizendine v. Visador Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:
After a non-jury trial in this diversity action to recover damages for personal injuries, the district court granted judgment for plaintiff Susan D. Brizendine and against Visador Company (Visa-dor), and Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company (PPG). PPG alone appeals.
On the night of November 12, 1964, Susan and other high-school age parishioners of First Christian Church, La *824Grande, Oregon, were standing in the lobby of the church prior to the commencement of a church youth group meeting. Susan was standing near the doorway to the lobby. When one of the boys arrived and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Klix Chemical Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Hills v. McGillvreyOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Watts v. Bacon & Van Buskirk Glass Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
- Johnny Paul Thibodaux v. McWane Cast Iron Pipe CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Ashland v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- Bryant v. Technical Research Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Hill v. General Motors Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Pearl v. Allied Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Brizendine v. Visador CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.