Legal Opinion
Kaser v. Protective Life Insurance
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 17, 2003No. CIV.A.WDQ-01-2601Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
QUARLES, District Judge.
Pending are motions to lift stay and to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, filed by defendants Protective Life Insurance Company (“PLIC”) and Financial Protection Marketing, Inc. (“FPM”).
I. Background
Plaintiff Richard M. Kaser is an “independent insurance agent” who matches businesses selling insurance with clients seeking it. Amended Complaint at ¶ 7. Kaser had a relationship with Chevy Chase Bank (“Chevy Chase”). Id. at ¶ 12. Chevy Chase contacted Kaser, seeking to insure against losses from automobile leasing. Amended Complaint…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kaser v. Financial Protection Marketing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Jackie N. Beach and Julia M. Beach, Husband and Wife v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. MerlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Veydt v. Lincoln National Life InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992