Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Ponder

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided March 7, 1928No. Motion No. 7395; No. 997-4866PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNickels, J.

Plaintiff in error has filed motion for rehearing in respect to the matter of Sumner-Sollitt Company’s - liability and the effect of receipt of payments under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Defendants in error have filed motion for rehearing in respect to all other matters.

We have reconsidered all questions involved in the light of the motions and arguments made therein. Nothing is presented that was not originally considered, and we adhere to the views formerly expressed.

In the original opinion we did not particularly notice the contention that Hanson was guilty of contributory negligence…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stokes v. Burlington-Rock Island R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. Hanson v. PonderTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API