Allen v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Judge MANNHEIMER,
The defendant, Leta G. Allerr, was brought to trial on a charge of driving under the influence, but the trial ended without a verdict after the trial judge declared a mistrial over the objection .of the defense attorney.
The State now intends to try Allen again on the same charge, and Allen has petitioned us to prohibit the second trial, Allen argues that there was no manifest necessity for the mistrial, and thus the double jeopardy clauses of the federal and state constitutions bar any retrial. 1
As we explain in this opinion, we conclude that a mistrial was manifestly…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Fields v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Larson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2003
- Browning v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
- Riney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tallon Westlake v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2026
- Westlake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2026