Legal Opinion
Stephen Bandak v. Eli Lilly
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 18, 2009No. 09-1620Published
1Opinion of the Court
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 09-1620, 09-2271 S TEPHEN I. B ANDAK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. E LI L ILLY AND C OMPANY R ETIREMENT P LAN, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. No. 1:06-CV-01622-LJM-JMS—Larry J. McKinney, Judge. A RGUED O CTOBER 9, 2009—D ECIDED N OVEMBER 18, 2009 Before P OSNER, R OVNER, and W ILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. P OSNER, Circuit Judge. Bandak, a retired employee of Eli Lilly, sued the company’s retirement plan under ERISA and received a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. SchoonejongenSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Aetna Business Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- In Re Unisys Corp. Retiree Medical Benefit "Erisa" Litigation. Gerald E. Pickering, Fred Tonnies, William Leonhardt, Evelyn Schmidt, Dudley Keyes, David Kahl, Paul Wright, Robert Wilt, Clay Bernichon, Edward Valle, Robert B. Welsh, Solveig Tschann, Bernard J. Jansen, Donald I. Klippenstein, Frederick W. Hoppe, Ludson F. Worsham, Edwin Marjala and Warren Hall, Individually and on Behalf of All Members of the Sperry Class Previously Certified by the Court Whose Claims Have Not Been SettledCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Marrs v. Motorola, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.