Legal Opinion

Gries Sports Enterprises, Inc. v. Cleveland Browns Football Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1986No. 85-704Published

1DissentWright, J.

I concur in Justice Holmes’ dissent, but must add a number of additional observations. I concur in the syllabus law of this case but I feel that the majority’s misapplication of the law to the facts is a travesty. I am troubled by the prospect of serious damage to the fabric of corporate law which will surely result from the majority’s opinion. Even a casual observer is aware of the growing crisis facing corporations in recruiting capable women and men to manage corporate affairs. The majority’s decision will exacerbate this problem.

I

The Delaware business judgment rule provides that a board…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  3. Sinclair Oil Corporation v. LevienSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971
  4. Pogostin v. RiceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  5. Blish v. Thompson Automatic Arms Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API