Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Danner

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1922No. Appeal, No. 280PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, J.,

Has the district attorney the right to indict the defendant for receiving stolen goods, knowing that they have been stolen, upon an information charging larceny? The Criminal Procedure Act March 31, 1860, P. L. 428, section 24, provides that a count for receiving may be added in every indictment for feloniously stealing. The district attorney, in the present case, for some reason which does not appear, instead of charging the defendant with larceny and receiving in one indictment, employed two. Beyond the question of costs, which does not arise, we find no error in this.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DunnickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Tyson v. DaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Tanner v. AsheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Commonwealth v. EppsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. McKeehanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API