Legal Opinion
DiCostanzo v. Chrysler Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 14, 1976No. Civ. A. No. 73-776-SPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDERS ON OUTSTANDING MOTIONS
SKINNER, District Judge.
The plaintiff’s motion to compel answers to its third set of interrogatories is ALLOWED, subject to the right of defendants to limit their answers to franchise dealers and dealer enterprise dealers in the Boston metropolitan area. Answers shall be filed within thirty days. Objections to the interrogatories are OVERRULED.
The motion to terminate the deposition of the plaintiff is DENIED.
Louis J. DeMarco filed a motion to intervene on June 7, 1973, within the period of limitation (tolled during the pendency of the class action…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States ex rel. Graybar Electric Co. v. MacKenzie-Foster Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1962
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Randall & BlakeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Ahern v. WarnerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Korwek v. HuntDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Cristanelli v. United States LinesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1977
- United States v. Randall & BlakeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987