Hynes v. Iadaróla
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Mangano, P. J.
The question raised on this appeal is whether the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs application for an award of predecision interest pursuant to CPLR 5001 in the instant civil forfeiture action. In our view, this question must be answered in the affirmative.
I
The defendants Victor Iadarola and Benito Iadarola (hereinafter the Iadarolas) were charged, in indictments filed in 1991, with multiple counts of the crimes of enterprise corruption, promoting gambling in the first degree, possession of gambling records in the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Members of the New York State Crime Victims BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Riggs v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Roberts v. . ElyNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Morgenthau v. Citisource, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- New York State Crime Victims Board v. T.J.M. Productions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. EdmonsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Dillon v. FarrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Hynes v. DallasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. McCoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.