Smith v. Spencer
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the Prolate Court of Kay County; lefora Rolert Neff, Prolate Judge. Action by B. F. Smith against W. W. Spencer. W. C. Spencer intervened. From an order dissolving the attachment piaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
■Opinion of the court by
Burford, C. J.:
The plaintiff in error, Smith, brought an action in the probate court of Kay county to recover •a judgment against W. W. Spencer, on a promissory note executed by Spencer and on an account for merchandise sold to Spencer. Smith procured an attachment to issue in the cause, and the writ was levied on certain chattels, a portion of which was claimed by the defendant W. W. Spencer, and. a portion by his son W. C. Spencer, who intervened. The grounds for attachment, as set out in the affidavit were: First, that the defendant has assigned and disposed of a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tootle, Hosea & Co. v. ColdwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Randall v. ShawSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Kelsey, Roberson & Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
3Cited by9 opinions
- Knights of the MacCabees of the World v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Washington County Abstract Company v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Edwards v. Johnston-Larimer Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Miller v. SeversSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Eggleston Et Ux. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.