Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. D'Agostino v. Keohane
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 14, 1989No. 89-5021PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MANSMANN, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal from the dismissal of petitioner’s writ of habeas corpus we are faced with the necessity of interpreting § 235(b)(3) of the Sentencing Reform Act of 19841 to determine whether an individual who is released prior to the day before *1168the Parole Commission expires in 1992 is within the jurisdiction of the Commission and therefore guaranteed a release date within the appropriate guideline range. This issue is one of first impression for us, although the Courts of Appeals for the Second and for the Fifth Circuit have decided the question.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- United States v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Zannino v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ricky Kevin Smith v. Ron G. Thompson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Bledsoe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Sims v. HastingsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- Walden v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Reliford, Rocky v. Veach, Rick V.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.