Legal Opinion

Lobel v. Cossey

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 7, 1907No. 28PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. On writ of error to review an order of the Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York, dated November 26, 1906, holding the plaintiff in error in contempt of court for failing to appear on June 27, 1906, as directed, and continue his cross-examination in an interference proceeding then pending in the Patent Office.

1Opinion of the Court

COXE, Circuit Judge.

In an interference proceeding between these parties the Commissioner of Patents, by virtue of the authority vested in him by law, fixed the time in which the parties were required to take testimony as follows: Eobel was to close his testimony May 22, 1906; Cossey’s rebuttal was to close June 6, and the final hearing was to be July 6, 1906. Eobel was produced as a witness in his own behalf on May 2ist, his direct examination was concluded and he was handed over for - cross-examination to Cossey’s counsel and was examined by him until the midday recess on the 22d of May,…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. American Sulphite Pulp Co. v. St. Regis Paper Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API