Legal Opinion

Smith v. 670 New Street, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 8, 1965No. 41017, 41018PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Russell, Judge.

The only question before us, and one which the trial court decided in the negative (after having held originally that the petition stated a cause of action) is whether the three amendments subsequent to our first opinion remove the petition from the area encompassed by the law of the case which is that the plaintiff’s injuries were due to her own negligence. The petitions have been materially amended deleting each allegation which this court in its first opinion depended upon for its conclusion that Mrs. Smith failed to exercise ordinary care for her own safety in the manner in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Misenhamer v. PharrCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  2. City of Columbus v. GriggsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Findley v. LipsitzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. Economy Gas & Appliance Co. v. KinslowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Newman v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  2. Horton v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. Desai v. Silver Dollar City, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Desai v. Silver Dollar City, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Scott Development Co. v. MunnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API