Kerlin v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1DissentBaker, Judge
I respectfully dissent.
The indictments are constitutionally deficient and cannot stand. Moreover, a criminal prosecution for neglect of a dependent cannot proceed on these facts. Before discussing those issues, however, I must first express my disagreement with the majority's procedural disposition of the Meredith indictment.
THE MEREDITH INDICTMENT
This court accepted this interlocutory appeal on January 4, 1991, assuming jurisdiction as of that date. Normally, however, the appellate tribunal does not acquire jurisdiction until the record of proceedings has been filed with the Clerk of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. DowneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Davis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Armour v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Costanzi v. RyanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Cash v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.