Legal Opinion

National Bank v. Massopust

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 6, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Howell.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Kalisch, J.

The respondent, a judgment creditor of one Charles Seel, filed its bill in the court- of chancery asking that a certain deed of conveyance made by Charles Seel of certain premises, previously owned by him, to the appellant, Joseph Massopust, be set aside and declared null and void, and that the premises be sold under an execution issued upon its judgment free from such encumbrance. ,

The ground upon which this relief was asked for, as stated in the bill, is that the deed of conveyance made by Seel to the appellant was without any…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. ParfnerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
  2. First National Bank of Elmer v. MoneyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API