Legal Opinion

Crenshaw v. Crenshaw

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 17, 1996No. S96A0363PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fletcher, Presiding Justice.

We granted the discretionary application in this case to consider whether notice by publication to a pro se party satisfies due process when the party’s address is known and to consider the scope of a lawyer’s professionalism duties to a pro se opposing party. Because we are able to decide this case on a narrower basis, we do not reach the broader issues. The record demonstrates that here the notice to the wife, a pro se litigant, in a divorce action involving children was not reasonably designed to insure that she had notice of the trial date and, thus, was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Green v. GreenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  3. Johnson v. Mayor &C. of CarrolltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jon Wiley Cronic v. Jeffrey H. DuvallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  2. Ford v. FordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  3. Wright v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  4. James v. JamesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  5. Mitsubishi Motors Credit of America, Inc. v. Robinson & Stephens, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API