Legal Opinion
Pettyjohn v. Sullivan
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided February 18, 1992No. Civ. A. No. 91-K-1078Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON RULE 59(e) OF FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
KANE, Senior District Judge.
The Defendant raises a variety of separate objections to my opinion, 776 F.Supp. 1482, and order and asks me to reconsider under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. I find that all of the defendants objections are groundless. Nonetheless, as the defendant raises some important issues, I will deal with them in detail.
The defendant maintains I incorrectly held that “the Social Security Act does not require that the claimants impairments prevent substantial gainful activity for twelve continuous…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Luna v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Eddie SINGLETARY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- John G. Broadbent v. Patricia Roberts Harris Secretary of Health, and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Parsons v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Ramon M. Rivas v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.