State v. West
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAUGHTREY, Justice.
With the passage of the Appellate Courts Improvements Act of 1992, the jurisdiction of this Court has become almost completely discretionary. 1 This means that as to non-capital criminal cases, we function primarily as a law-development court, rather than as an error-correction court. Occasionally, however, a criminal case comes to our attention in which the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction is seriously in doubt. This appeal is one of those troubling cases, and, thus, we granted review principally to scrutinize the proof offered to convict the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. BullingtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
- Bass v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
- State v. PattonTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by273 opinions
- State v. BlandTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. CarruthersTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. AdkissonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
- State v. MajorsTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. HesterTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
268 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.