Legal Opinion

Saperstein v. Rich

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamm, J.

This, in general terms, is a motion for a temporary . injunction to restrain the defendants from picketing the plaintiffs’ store.

The plaintiffs conduct a pharmacy and luncheonette in the city of Troy. Their business activities are conducted exclusively in this State. About sixteen persons are employed, of whom an average of nine is in the luncheonette department. It is with these latter nine only that this motion is concerned. The defendants are the president and the combined secretary and business agent of a local of the Hotel and Restaurant Employees’ Union.

On the petition of the plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goodwins, Inc. v. HagedornNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. La Manna v. O'GradyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hammer v. Local No. 211New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  2. Wood v. O'GradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API