Legal Opinion

United States v. Pace

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided March 17, 1942No. Cr. Nos. 2205, 2210PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNERLY, District Judge.

These are prosecutions under the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, Sections 301 to 318, Title 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix. Defendants duly registered under Section 302, and made out and filed their questionnaires, but claimed exemption from training and service in the land and naval forces of the United States:(a) Because as they say they were and are “regular or duly ordained ministers of religion” under Subdivision (d) of Section 305; and(b) Because as they say they were and are “conscientiously opposed to participation in war in any form”, and “conscientiously…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chin Yow v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Angelus v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  3. Shimola v. Local Board No. 42 for Cuyahoga CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1941
  4. Franke v. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
  5. Petition of SobermanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
  2. United States Ex Rel. Trainin v. CainCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  3. Baxley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
  4. United States v. AlviesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API