Legal Opinion

Lindenthal v. Hatch

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On writ of error from Hudson Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

*30The opinion of the court was delivered by

Depue, J.

At the trial the plaintiffs’ attorney called as a witness Thomas P. Wickes, one of the plaintiffs, and propounded to him the following question :

“Mr. Wickes, you examined the interrogatories prepared by the defendant’s counsel in this case and the answers thereto made by you and. Mr. Hatch and Mr. Clute ? ” to which wetness answered “Yes, sir,” and then the attorney of the plaintiffs asked the following question of said witness: “ Having those in mind and assuming that during the years 1891-2-3-4, at various dates in the months of those…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mayor of Bayonne v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
  2. Diament v. CollotySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API