Legal Opinion
Ragsdale v. Dyer
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. MaloNe, Special Judge,
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is a bill to recover the sum of $4,000, alleged to be the balance due and unpaid on account of the sale of *499certain insulators, poles, and other equipment, made by complainant, Ragsdale, to defendant, Dyer, for use in the construction of an electric power line from Lebanon, Tenn., to Murfreesboro, Tenn.
The chancellor gave a decree for complainant for the items sued for, with two exceptions, which are not now in question.
From this decree defendant, Dyer, has appealed, and his assignments of error in this court may be grouped…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fort Leavenworth Railroad v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Martinsburg & Potomac Railroad v. MarchSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- American Freehold Land Mortgage Co. v. SewellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Pinches v. Swedish Evangelical Lutheran ChurchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887
- Healy v. FallonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Draper v. DraperCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
- Tennessee & Southeastern Coal Co. v. Schwitzer Cummins Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1938
- D. W. Winkelman Co., Inc. v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
- Gulf Refining Co. v. BelzTennessee Supreme Court · 1958