Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Tornabene v. Zor, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 6, 1966No. 2257Published

1ConcurrenceSamuel, Judge

I agree with the conclusion reached by-the majority. This concurrence, is written for the purpose of pointing out what to me are important considerations.

That appellant may have been a negligent tax debtor, as suggested in the trial court reasons adopted in the majority opinion, is immaterial. Even if he had actual but informal knowledge that the taxes were delinquent and the property was about to be sold, such knowledge would not supply the place of the notice required by law. Recker v. Dupuy, 161 La. 392, 198 So. 782.

I cannot agree with that part of the trial court’s reasons which states:…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Recker v. DupuySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. Harris v. Mount Zion Baptist ChurchLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API