Tucker v. Housel

The only question presented by the briefs in this case is that the court erred in sustaining an attachment issued at the beginning of the case. Thereunder certain personal property claimed to be exempt was levied upon by the sheriff.

Motions to discharge the attachment were filed. No mention of claim of exemption was made in either motion. Before either motion was passed upon, a redelivery bond was given and the property was restored to the possession of the defendants. A plea in intervention Was filed by the Wm. L. Tucker Printing Company, a corporation, claiming ownership of the property.…