Legal Opinion
Wilde v. United States
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided June 27, 2005No. 2:04-cr-00031Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MURGUIA, District Judge.
Petitioner, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on April 2, 2004 by filing a petition to quash a third-party summons issued by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). (Doc. 1). Petitioner filed a first amended petition to quash on October 12, 2004. (Doc. 10). 1 Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss the first amended petition to quash (Doc. 11), Petitioner has filed a response (Doc. 13) and Respondent has filed a reply. (Doc. 14).
In his first amended petition to quash, Petitioner alleges that on or about March 15, 2004, Respondent, through Revenue Agent Wayne…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Western Mining Council v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Mark G. Epstein Samuel C. Arsers, on Behalf of Themselves & All Others Similarly Situated v. Washington Energy Co. James A. ThorpeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. K.T. Derr, Chairman of Chevron CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Ross P. Upton v. Internal Revenue Service and Gloria A. Hassinger, United States of America, Movant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.