Uretek (USA), Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge.
Parties in this insurance coverage dispute call upon the Court to resolve, as a matter of Texas law, whether Defendant Continental Casualty Company had a duty to defend Plaintiff Uretek (USA), Inc. on counterclaims alleged in a now-concluded patent infringement lawsuit. The Court finds that no duty to defend was triggered. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 20) is GRANTED; Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 17) is DENIED. Final judgment will issue separately.
I. BACKGROUND
The facts of this case are uncontested.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Merchants Fast Motor Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
- Gilbert Texas Construction, L.P. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Guideone Elite Insurance Co. v. Fielder Road Baptist ChurchTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Swift Distribution, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2014
- Gore Design Completions, Ltd. v. Hartford Fire Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.