Carmell v. Texas
Supreme Court of the United States
1Concurrence
Justice Ginsburg,
with whom The ChieF Justice, Justice O’Connor, and Justice Kennedy join, dissenting.
The Court today holds that the amended version of Article 38.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure reduces the amount of proof necessary to support a sexual assault conviction, and that its retroactive application therefore violates the Ex Post Facto Clause. In so holding, the Court misreads both the Texas statute and our precedents concerning the Ex Post Facto Clause. Article 38.07 is not, as the Court would have it, most accurately characterized as a “sufficiency of the evidence rule”;…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Malik v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.