Legal Opinion

Torrence v. . Davidson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1884PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from an order made at Spring Term, 1883, of Meck-lenburg- Superior Court, by MacRae, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMerriMON, J.

There has been some irregularity and confusion in the conduct of this action, but it is not properly before us now, and we are not at liberty to suggest how the irregulari ties are to be corrected, or pass upon the merits of the important •questions presented by the record and eventually to be settled. The appeal was prematurely taken.

The court below heard the case upon the report of the clerk •and exceptions thereto, and having found the facts of the case and the law arising thereon, and settled the rights of the parties, ordered a recommittal of the report, with instructions to the clerk to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lutz v. . ClineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Emery v. . HardeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  2. Wallace Bros. v. DouglasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API