Davis v. Steigerwalt
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtOlszewski, J.
¶ 1 Roger Steigerwalt (“appellant”) appeals following the order issued by the court below granting a new trial on the issue of survival action damages. The order was entered on the post-trial motion of John and Kathleen Davis (“appellees”) who appeared below asserting claims individually and as co-administrators of the Estate of Erin Davis, their deceased daughter. Denise Prutzman and Edward Metroka, individually and as co-administrators of the estate of Holly Metroka, join the arguments of appellant in part and the arguments of appellees in part. We affirm the decision of the trial court.
¶ 2…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Kiser v. SchulteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Neison v. HinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Trach v. FellinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- GAGLIANO v. DitzlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mirabel v. MoralesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Kindermann, P. v. Cunningham, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Bell, N. v. O'Neill, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- Cowher, K. v. Kodali, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Kindermann, P. v. Cunningham, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.