Legal Opinion

Davis v. Steigerwalt

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 4, 2003PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlszewski, J.

¶ 1 Roger Steigerwalt (“appellant”) appeals following the order issued by the court below granting a new trial on the issue of survival action damages. The order was entered on the post-trial motion of John and Kathleen Davis (“appellees”) who appeared below asserting claims individually and as co-administrators of the Estate of Erin Davis, their deceased daughter. Denise Prutzman and Edward Metroka, individually and as co-administrators of the estate of Holly Metroka, join the arguments of appellant in part and the arguments of appellees in part. We affirm the decision of the trial court.

¶ 2…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Kiser v. SchulteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Neison v. HinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Trach v. FellinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. GAGLIANO v. DitzlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mirabel v. MoralesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Kindermann, P. v. Cunningham, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Bell, N. v. O'Neill, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. Cowher, K. v. Kodali, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. Kindermann, P. v. Cunningham, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API