Legal Opinion
Koeppe v. Lundell Manufacturing Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 9, 1959No. 4-59 Civil 96PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, District Judge.
The plaintiff brought this action in the Hennepin County District Court to recover for personal injuries sustained while using a farm implement type ma•chine described as a forage chopper with .hay conditioner attachment. He had purchased the machinery from Claude Moorhead, a retail merchant, who had .purchased it from Keegan Equipment Company, a distributor or dealer of Lundell Manufacturing Company, the .manufacturer.
The complaint consists of two causes ■of action. One is based upon tort and the other on the breach of express or implied warranties. In the first cause…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Baltimore Steamship Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Knight v. Chrysler CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1955
- Henry Kraft Mercantile Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Moosbrugger v. McGraw-Edison CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1963
- Frontier Enterprises, Inc. v. ICA Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1970