Legal Opinion

Dunbar v. Renfroe

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided March 18, 2003No. 2001-CP-01208-COAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, P.J.,

for the court.

¶ 1. The Scott County Chancery Court approved a petition to settle a doubtful claim belonging to the Estate of Daisey Pearl Saveli, but approved attorney’s fees of only 33 1/3%, for Dunbar-Monroe. Dunbar has appealed that decision, alleging that because it was employed under a durable power of attorney, the chancellor lacked authority to award attorney’s fees in an amount less than that identified by the employment contract. The decision of the chancery court is affirmed.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2. On May 12, 1997, Daisy Pearl Sa-veli executed a durable power of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McNeil v. HesterMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Johnson v. Hinds CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Collins by Smith v. McMurryMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Beckett v. HoworthMississippi Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. RankinMississippi Supreme Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Guardianship of SavellMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Dunbar v. RenfroeMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  3. David C. Dunbar v. Shirley RenfroeMississippi Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API