Albaugh v. Cooley
Appellate Court of Illinois
1DissentJustice McNAMARA
I respectfully dissent from the conclusion of the majority that judgment should be entered on the general verdict in favor of plaintiff notwithstanding the jury’s answer to a special interrogatory finding plaintiff guilty of contributory negligence. The majority finds that when all the evidence is viewed in its aspect most favorable to defendant, it so overwhelmingly favors plaintiff on the issue of contributory negligence that no contrary verdict could ever stand. I believe there was sufficient evidence to support the special interrogatory and answer, and thus the trial court properly…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- People v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- People Ex Rel. Stamos v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- Agran v. Checker Taxi Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1952
- Sommese v. Maling Bros., Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1966
- Freeman v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.