Legal Opinion

Diamond v. Dougfield, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJ. Irwin Shapiro, J.

This is a motion for an order, pursuant to rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice, dismissing the complaint on the ground that it appears on the face thereof that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The action is brought by the plaintiff “ suing for Himself as Stockholder, and All Other Stockholders of Dougfield, Inc., in like situation who shall choose to make themselves parties to this action.” Thus, this is a representative action brought by the plaintiff as a stockholder for the benefit of the defendant corporation.

The complaint alleges that Samuel Fields,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. . Virginia Passenger Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Marco v. SachsNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Balling v. CasabiancaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Teperman v. WilliamsonNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API