Legal Opinion

Chambless v. Brown

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 1, 2010No. 2010-CA-0716PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ROLAND L. BELSOME, Judge.

[, This appeal arises from a dispute over property boundaries by adjacent property owners. After a trial on the merits, the trial court ruled in favor of Constance Brown, determining that the placement of Ms. Brown’s proposed fence was consistent with where the property line had been established by numerous surveys over the years. For the following reasons we affirm.

The disputed property line separates two Orleans Parish properties, 1311 St. Claude Avenue and 1317 St. Claude Avenue. Ms. Brown owns the property at 1311 St. Claude Avenue. That property was originally…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. Haas Land Company v. O'QUINLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Merritt v. BrennanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Voisin v. LukeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barrois v. PanepintoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API