Legal Opinion

De Haan v. Crum

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1924No. Docket No. 72Published

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

Plaintiffs are building contractors of Kalamazoo, Michigan. They are suing for a balance of $2,231.98, claimed to be due on a contract for the construction of a dwelling for the defendants. The defendants concede that there is something due plaintiffs on the contract price, but claim that they are entitled to the following deductions: $1,000 damages because the house was not built according to contract, $25 damages to decorations because of leaks due to defective work on the roof and about the windows, and $500 which the plaintiffs agreed to deduct in consideration of a change in the time and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Falk v. NitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API