Aiken v. Peck & Allen
Supreme Court of Georgia
Non-suit. Practice in Superior Court. Motion to Reinstate. Liens. Saw Mills. Demand. Before Judge Hammond. Fulton Superior Court. October Term, 1883. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Jackson, Chief Justice.
An affidavit to foreclose a lien for saw-logs furnished L. TT- Hall & Co. ivas levied upon a steam saw-mill, and the mill was claimed by Peck & Allen. The affidavit al*435leged that the demand for payment was made on Hall & Co., who “were the owners of the said saw-mill when said saw-logs were furnished by deponent.” The proof was, that the saw-mill, when the demand was made, was in the possession of Peck & Allen, whom the plaintiff learned had bought it, and who were running said mill when the demand was made on Hall & Co. On this affidavit, and proof by plaintiff, the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fannin v. DurdinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
- Porter v. Lively & McElroySupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
- Anderson v. BeardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
3Cited by12 opinions
- Regopoulas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Van Dyke v. Van DykeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Clopton v. CloptonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
- Walker v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- City of Atlanta v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.