Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Martinez

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 29, 1987No. 69754PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLINTON, Judge.

This is a postconviction application for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to Article 11.07, V.A.C.C.P. Applicant argues his due process and due course of law rights were violated when, pursuant to Article 42.12, § 22, V.A.C.C.P., the Board of Pardons and Paroles (hereinafter “Board”) administratively revoked his parole, without a hearing, upon learning applicant had been convicted of a felony offense while free on parole. We agree and will grant relief.

On May 24,1979, applicant was convicted of three separate commissions of the offense of aggravated robbery, and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Ex Parte WilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. Ex Parte SnowCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Ex Parte: Jerry Ladon Green, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1994
  4. In the Interest of J.W.T.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In the Interest of J.W.T.Texas Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API