Ex Parte Bradstreet v. Huntington
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Marshall
This motion is for an attachment against the judge of the northern district of New York, for a contempt of this court in refusing to obey, its mandamus, directing him to reinstate certain suits which had been dismissed from the docket of that court, and to proceed to adjudicate them according to law.
The suits were reinstated and ordered for trial as directed by this court; but delays have taken place so that a verdict has been given in only one of them, and in that judgment has not not yet been rendered.
The motion for the attachment is supported by an affidavit of the party, verified by the…
2Cited by19 opinions
- In Re BurrusSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. StrausSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. Apollo Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Barber Asphalt Pav. Co. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.