Legal Opinion

Dunlop v. Munroe

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 14, 1812PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

11 U.S. 242

7 Cranch 242

3 L.Ed. 329

DUNLOP

v.

MUNROE.

March 9, 1812

1

Present. All the Judges.

2

ERROR to the Circuit Court for the district of Columbia, sitting at Washington, in an action wherein James and John Dunlop were Plaintiffs, and Thomas Munroe, the deputy post-master at Washington, was Defendant.

3

The declaration after having been several times amended, contained nine counts.

4

1. The first count was as follows—Thomas Munroe, late of Washington county, gentleman, was attached to answer unto James Dunlop and John Dunlop in a plea of trespass on the case, &c. whereupon the said James and John,…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Johnson.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dunlop v. MunroeSupreme Court of the United States · 1812

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Emil Jutrowski v. Township of RiverdaleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  3. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Ali Pineda v. Hamilton Cty., OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API