Legal Opinion
State v. Eubank
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 4, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By TAYLOR, J.
Appellant was found guilty in the Court of Common Pleas of having violated §§1047, 1056, 1058-1 and 1058-3, G£, in that he had unlawfully, wilfully and purposely operated a steam boiler of more than thirty horse power without obtaining a license so to do, and that he had permitted the boiler to be operated without being in charge of a duly licensed engineer or boiler operator.
Appellant owns and operates a large greenhouse in or near Sylvania in this county and heats this greenhouse by steam generated from two boilers, each of more than thirty horse power, which boilers…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- In Re RahrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Anderson v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- Brockman v. Contractors Licensing BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
- Texas Commission on Environmental Quality v. Wilbarger Creek Conservation Alliance, Marilyn Kelinske, Anne Brockenbrough, and Jonathan Beall, Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District2025