Travel Guard Group, Inc. v. Grubb
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We find no abuse of the trial court’s discretion in denying temporary injunctive relief for the enforcement of the terms of a non-competitive agreement. See Uro-Care, P.A. v. Montford, M.D., 775 So.2d 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Bradley v. Health Coalition, Inc., 687 So.2d 329 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Lurton v. Muldon Motor Co., 523 So.2d 706 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); see also Kupscznk v. Blasters, Inc., 647 So.2d 888, 891 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), review denied, 658 So.2d 991 (Fla.1995); Cordis Corp. v. Prooslin, 482 So.2d 486 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).
Affirmed.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cordis Corp. v. ProoslinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Bradley v. Health Coalition, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Lurton v. Muldon Motor Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Kupscznk v. Blasters, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Uro-Care, P.A. v. MontfordDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000