Legal Opinion

Swartz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 24, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge COHN JUBELIRER.

Francis Swartz (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board), which affirmed a WCJ’s order granting Cheltenham York Road Nursing & Rehabilitation’s (Employer) Petition for Expert Interview of Claimant. Claimant argues on appeal that, before a WCJ can issue an order granting an Employer’s Petition for Expert Interview, he is required to hold an evidentiary hearing, approve or disapprove the vocational counselor and, then, issue a “reasoned decision” with findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Claimant suffered a work-related…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caso v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. LeDonne v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. H. K. Porter Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Henry v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Leaseway Systems, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. P. Watson v. WCAB (Hillsberg)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. T. Cantanese v. WCAB (RTA Services Co., Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. T. Dolquist v. WCAB (City of New Castle)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API